栖息谷-管理人的网上家园

[原创]准备重新翻译 泰勒的科学管理原则

[复制链接] 17
回复
5894
查看
打印 上一主题 下一主题
楼主
跳转到指定楼层
分享到:
发表于 2006-5-10 15:07:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

因为看到84年的翻译有点不通顺

打算重译 望各位老师能不吝指教~!

 

科学管理原则(Principles of Scientific Management

作者:Frederick Winslow Taylor (1911)

            翻译:陈青(2006)

前言

罗斯福总统曾在白宫对州长的演说中预见性地谈到对国家资源的保护只是全国效率这一更大问题的基础

全国即刻认识到了保护物质资源的重要性,并开始了能有效达成这一目的的大行动。然而时至今日,我们不过是朦胧的意识到提高我们全国效率这一更大问题的重要性。

我们能看到我们的森林正在消失,我们的水电资源在浪费,我们的土壤正被洪水带入大海;以及煤炭和铁矿的耗竭。然而我们在行动上的错误,失败的指挥或者无效率正每天对我们的人力资源造成更大的浪费,这就是罗斯福先生所说的缺乏国家效率,它们不那么明显,不那么可见,只是朦胧的被意识到。

我们可以看到、体会到对物质的浪费。人们行为上的笨拙,无效率,失败的指挥却不留下任何看得见或能体会得到的东西。要意识到它们需要进行回忆,努力的想象。因此,虽然我们在人力资源上的损失大于我们对物质的浪费,但它们中的一个深深的触动了我们,而另一个却仅被我们微弱的感知到。

直到今天,公众还没有激起对更高国家效率的重视。没有以就思考如何带来更高国家效率为主题的会议。但仍然存在着对更高效率普遍需求的迹象。

对更好、更有能力的人才(从大公司的总裁一直到我们家庭的雇工)的搜寻从来没有像今天这样积极。而且对有能力人才的需求多于供给的这种情况超过以往的任何时候。

我们所需要的是现成的有能力的人才;是其他受过训练的人。然而只有当我们充分的领悟到我们的责任,同时也是机遇,进行社会性的合作去训练和培养像这样的有能力人才,而非一味地寻找其他受过训练的人,我们才会通向全国效率之路。

在过去流行着行业领袖是天生的,而非培养出来的这样一种观点;在以前我们认为有了正确的人选,指挥权就可以放心的交给他了。而在将来我们则会认识到领导者接受适当的训练同样也很重要,并且没有哪个优秀的人才(在旧的个人管理体系内) 能有希望战胜数个因恰当组织而高效协作的普通人。

在过去个人是第一要素,在未来组织将是第一要素。不过这并不暗示不需要杰出的人才。恰恰相反,任何优秀的组织第一要任就是要发展一流人才;并且在管理体系之下最好的人才要比以往任何时候都要更明确的、更迅速的提升到最高的位置。

本书主要阐述:

(1)通过简明的实例说明我们各类日常行为中的无效率现象正在使整个国家都遭受着巨大的损失。

(2)应当通过管理体系去解决这种无效率现象,而不是去寻找一些超常人才。

(3)有效管理是一门科学,它立足于各种定义明晰的条理和原则。我们可以进一步将这些条理和原则应用于各种人类活动:从最简单的个体行为一直到最需要密切协作的大公司运作。并简要的通过实例来说明对这些原则的恰当运用可以产生令人震惊的结果。

本书起初是写给全美机械工程师协会的。所以在列举实例时考虑的读者主要是制造业工厂的工程师、经理,以及在这些工厂中工作的员工。我希望这本书能使其他的读者体会到这些原则可以同样有效的运用到各种社会活动中去:包括管理我们的家;管理我们的农场;管理我们大、小商店的运营;我们的教堂,我们的慈善机构,我们的大学以及我们的政府部门。

 

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-10 15:09:41编辑过]
18
发表于 2006-10-20 23:51:07 | 只看该作者

真的很强啊 一本经典的书 终于可以看到经典的翻译了!

今天我用上了 感谢楼主 也感谢daoke2005

17
发表于 2006-6-16 18:35:03 | 只看该作者

这本书很老了,但很经典.

16
发表于 2006-6-12 20:39:22 | 只看该作者

我有原文的

The Principles of Scientific Management

(1911)

by Frederick Winslow Taylor, M.E., Sc.D.


 

Introduction

Chapter I: Fundamentals of Scientific Management

Chapter II: The Principles of Scientific Management

 

INTRODUCTION

President Roosevelt, in his address to the Governors at the White House, prophetically remarked that "The conservation of our national resources is only preliminary to the larger question of national efficiency."

The whole country at once recognized the importance of conserving our material resources and a large movement has been started which will be effective in accomplishing this object. As yet, however, we have but vaguely appreciated the importance of "the larger question of increasing our national efficiency."

We can see our forests vanishing, our water-powers going to waste, our soil being carried by floods into the sea; and the end of our coal and our iron is in sight. But our larger wastes of human effort, which go on every day through such of our acts as are blundering, ill-directed, or inefficient, and which Mr Roosevelt refers to as a lack of "national efficiency," are less visible, less tangible, and are but vaguely appreciated.

We can see and feel the waste of material things. Awkward, inefficient, or ill-directed movements of men, however, leave nothing visible or tangible behind them. Their appreciation calls for an act of memory, an effort of the imagination. And for this reason, even though our daily loss from this source is greater than from our waste of material things, the one has stirred us deeply, while the other has moved us but little.

As yet there has been no public agitation for "greater national efficiency," no meetings have been called to consider how this is to be brought about. And still there are signs that the need for greater efficiency is widely felt.

The search for better, for more competent men, from the presidents of our great companies down to our household servants, was never more vigorous than it is now. And more than ever before is the demand for competent men in excess of the supply.

What we are all looking for, however, is the ready-made, competent man; the man whom some one else has trained. It is only when we fully realize that our duty, as well as our opportunity, lies in systematically cooperating to train and to make this competent man, instead of in hunting for a man whom some one else has trained, that we shall be on the road to national efficiency.

In the past the prevailing idea has been well expressed in the saying that "Captains of industry are born, not made" and the theory has been that if one could get the right man, methods could be safely left to him. In the future it will be appreciated that our leaders must be trained right as well as born right, and that no great man can (with the old system of personal management) hope to compete with a number of ordinary men who have been properly organized so as efficiently to cooperate.

In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first. This in no sense, however, implies that great men are not needed. On the contrary, the first object of any good system must be that of developing first-class men; and under systematic management the best man rises to the top more certainly and more rapidly than ever before.

This paper has been written:

First. To point out, through a series of simple illustrations, the great loss which the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in almost all of our daily acts.

Second. To try to convince the reader that the remedy for this inefficiency lies in systematic management, rather than in searching for some unusual or extraordinary man.

Third. To prove that the best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles, as a foundation. And further to show that the fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations, which call for the most elaborate cooperation. And, briefly, through a series of illustrations, to convince the reader that whenever these principles are correctly applied, results must follow which are truly astounding.

This paper was originally prepared for presentation to The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. The illustrations chosen are such as, it is believed, will especially appeal to engineers and to managers of industrial and manufacturing establishments, and also quite as much to all of the men who are working in these establishments. It is hoped, however, that it will be clear to other readers that the same principles can be applied with equal force to all social activities: to the management of our homes; the management of our farms; the management of the business of our tradesmen, large and small; of our churches, our philanthropic institutions, our universities, and our governmental departments.

 

CHAPTER I: FUNDAMENTALS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT

THE principal object of management should be to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for each employee.

The words "maximum prosperity" are used, in their broad sense, to mean not only large dividends for the company or owner, but the development of every branch of the business to its highest state of excellence, so that the prosperity may be permanent.


 各位高手看看

15
发表于 2006-6-2 17:08:53 | 只看该作者
请问哪里有英文原版?谢谢
14
发表于 2006-5-25 11:44:31 | 只看该作者

翻译的不错哦,请问有后续吗?

[em09]
13
发表于 2006-5-12 17:47:17 | 只看该作者
12
发表于 2006-5-12 13:24:18 | 只看该作者

楼主毅力可嘉。。。

11
发表于 2006-5-12 10:04:11 | 只看该作者

我正需要呢!

哈哈

10
发表于 2006-5-12 10:03:39 | 只看该作者

使用高级回帖 (可批量传图、插入视频等)快速回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入

本版积分规则   Ctrl + Enter 快速发布  

发帖时请遵守我国法律,网站会将有关你发帖内容、时间以及发帖IP地址等记录保留,只要接到合法请求,即会将信息提供给有关政府机构。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表