|
Good question. Top management means those leaders. Politicians, such as Mr. Tony Blair, will be ordinary people's boss. Those leaders, normally, can consider the point much widerly due to their high position. In contrast, others in lower position could not see further because of the limitation of the views. Of course, these different people's views would be conflict. As a result, I cannot quite understand why we need democracy. On the other hand, the democracy would be the best approach for us to reduce the risk. If our leaders cannot really understand what they should do. Others could help them. As we know, in some cases, the boss would only care about themselves rather than others. These behavious would definitely destory a company or even a country. Consequently, democracy will be the best way to prevent this from happening. By contrast with these two different views, if we really need to choose one of them to manage and organise our company and our country, democracy would be a better choice. Please do remember, the degree of opening our heart to others would depend on different culture and situation. In other words, how can we expect those rural people understand English so soon? Indeed, Participative management would depend on different culture. In China, we need to choose one of specific method which can integrate into the Chinese culture.. 建设有中国特色的社会主义！强!!! | 
